HomeIndicators › RHODL Ratio

RHODL Ratio today

Last updated Loading source date · Also called Realised HODL Ratio · Weighted 20% of the LiftOffr Score
RHODL Ratio · 0-100 normalised
Loading the latest available source data.
The RHODL Ratio compares the value held by coins that moved in the last week against coins that last moved one to two years ago. When new money floods in and old holders sell, the ratio spikes — which is what a cycle top looks like from on-chain. It has run hot near every major Bitcoin top since 2013 — though "run hot" is not the same as "fired on the day", and this page's own "where it has been wrong" section covers where that distinction cost something. RHODL carries the joint-highest weight in the Score, at 20%.

What it actually measures

Whether the coins changing hands are new speculative money or long-held supply waking up. Tops happen when both are true at once.

How it is calculated

The ratio of the 1-week to 1-2 year Realized Cap HODL Wave bands, adjusted by market age in days. LiftOffr uses the source’s normalized reading, not the raw ratio.

No standalone write-up for RHODL Ratio yet — the closest long-form read is the CBBI composite explainer, which covers how these normalised readings are built. For the wider framework, start with how to identify a Bitcoin cycle top.

What it read at every cycle top and bottom

This is the table that does not exist anywhere else. Every value is the RHODL Ratio reading on the day of that cycle turn, pulled from the same daily series the number above comes from.

Cycle turnDateBTC closeRHODL Ratio (0-100)
2013 top2013-11-30$1,119100
2017 top2017-12-17$19,250100
2021 top2021-11-10$64,75693
2025 top2025-10-06$124,82489
2015 bottom2015-01-14$1760
2018 bottom2018-12-15$3,1852
2022 bottom2022-11-21$15,7783

Readings are normalised 0-100. Bitcoin closes are the same day's price from the source dataset. Cycle turn dates are daily-close highs and lows.

Average reading at a cycle top: 95. Average at a cycle bottom: 2. The weakest top signal it ever gave was the 2025 top at 89; the highest it ever read at a bottom was the 2022 bottom at 3.

Where it has been wrong

A low normalized reading can persist while price continues falling. Neither a high nor a low reading establishes that a turning point has occurred.

This section is on every indicator page here on purpose. An indicator sold as infallible is being sold, not explained — and the gap between "it called three tops" and "it will call the next one" is where people lose money.

The other eight

No single indicator survives contact with a real cycle. These are the other components of the LiftOffr Score, live right now:

Puell Multiple
Unavailable
weight 20% of the Score
Logarithmic Regression Band
Unavailable
weight 15% of the Score
MVRV Z-Score
Unavailable
weight 15% of the Score
Pi Cycle Top Indicator
Unavailable
weight 10% of the Score
2-Year MA Multiplier
Unavailable
weight 5% of the Score
Reserve Risk
Unavailable
weight 5% of the Score
Woobull Top Cap Ratio
Unavailable
weight 5% of the Score
RUPL / NUPL
Unavailable
weight 5% of the Score

The reading tells you where. It doesn't tell you what to do.

My Bear Market Buy Plan is the nine-tier ladder I'm actually executing against these indicators — every level, every trigger, timestamped receipts when a tier fires. $29 once, no subscription.

Get my plan — $29, once →
Or read the whole free feed first — the live Score, the daily brief, the open Discord →

Questions

What is the RHODL Ratio reading today?
The reading panel shows the latest available response and its source date. If the component is unavailable, it is labeled unavailable. Historical tables are dated examples.
What did the RHODL Ratio read at the last Bitcoin top?
At the October 2025 top it read 89. Every cycle top and bottom since 2013 is in the table on this page, taken from the same daily series.
Has the RHODL Ratio ever been wrong?
A low normalized reading can persist while price continues falling. Neither a high nor a low reading establishes that a turning point has occurred.
Is the RHODL Ratio enough on its own?
No. Every indicator on this site has a failure mode, which is why LiftOffr weights nine of them into one score rather than trusting any single one. The live composite is at liftoffr.com/cycle.
Read this first. Everything on this page is educational market information, not financial advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. I am not a registered investment adviser. Indicator readings are historical measurements, not predictions — every one of them has been wrong before, which is why each page here has a section saying exactly how. Bitcoin can fall further than you expect and stay there longer than you expect. Do your own research and never invest money you cannot afford to lose.
© 2026 LiftOffr · Educational content only. Not financial advice. Indicator data derived from the public CBBI dataset.
Every dated signal on this site is the LiftOffr Score computed over public historical price and on-chain data — a backtest, not a record of trades placed or calls published at the time. Past performance does not predict future results. Torin Christianson is not a registered investment adviser and nothing here is personalised to you. Full record, including every signal that went the wrong way, at /receipts. LiftOffr LLC (Montana). 18+ only. Full income and performance disclaimer at /disclaimer.